We have secured the amazing Mat Mchugh (former front man of The Beautiful Girls) to perform live! We asked our Facebook followers who they thought would be the best Australian musician to support Take 3 and there was an overwhelming response to Mat Mchugh. Mat being the legend that he is has obliged, thanks mate! You can download his new album ‘Love Come Save Me’ for free at www.matmchughmusic.com

The feature film will be the award winning ‘Minds in the Water’ about pro surfer & environmentalist Dave ‘Rasta’ Rastovich & his efforts to protect whales & dolphins from human harm. It’s an epic tale of how one man can inspire a generation of change. Dave is one of the founders of Surfers for Cetaceans, check them out.

If we have time we plan on showing the new surf film by acclaimed surf director Taylor Steele called, ‘Here & Now’ after the feature film. This film explores a single day in surfing around the world & features Kelly Slater, Rob Machado, Rasta and Steph Gilmore among others.

There will be a number of environmental organisations there on the night to discuss local initiatives to protect our oceans. There will also be a bumper raffle where you could win: a wooden board by Tom Wegener, signed photographs by Rasta, autographed surf films by Taylor Steele, bamboo sunglasses from Topheads Eyewear, surfwear from Dripping Wet Surf Co., sustainable products from ReChusable, subscriptions for Green Lifestyle Magazine and much more!

A HUGE thanks to Ben & Jerry’s Openair Cinema Bondi for supporting Take 3, this is our second year with them & we look forward to many more.

Tickets from just $17 – head to www.openaircinemas.com.au

This years event will be amazing & we’d love to sell all 500 tickets so please share this info & tell everyone to come along.

Thanks to Elli at Studio Alte for designing the rad poster!

Every week news emerges of county or Country banning plastic bags, or styrofoam food packaging or businesses eliminating plastic straws and moving to more sustainable options. Social Media has become the new democracy with unhappy consumers voicing their concerns and thankfully, companies are (forced into?) listening.

From a supermarket forced into removing pre-peeled bananas wrapped in a styrofoam tray from their shelves to Chupa Chups issuing a Global statement that they would ‘look into’ new alternatives to their plastic sticks, social media is the new platform for change and it’s spreading like wildfire. Follow the Chupa Chups Facebook campaign here.

As for me…I had a big step recently with the launch of the new ‘Truth’ bottle by Cheeki Stainless Steel. Cheeki have been supporting my non-profit Take 3 for a long time now so when Simon from Cheeki asked me if I’d like to write a short essay for a new bottle design I jumped at the chance! We call it ‘The truth about plastic bottles’ and in short it’s my views on why it’s so stupid to drink bottled water when in Australia we have qua
lity potable water straight from the tap.

If you’d like to buy one you can visit my new website ReChusable where we sell a whole range of functional reusable alternatives to disposable plastic and for wholesale enquiries  you can contact Cheeki directly.

An icon and role model to many, Captain Moore famously stumbled across floating plastics when sailing from Hawaii to California in 1997. The shock, disgust and impending actions of Charles led to the word hearing of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch for the first time.

Charles established the Algalita Marine Research Institute and has led global action and research into this issue for over 15 years. In 2011 I had the pleasure of meeting Charles at his home in Long Beach, California after my own voyage to the Garbage Patch and now it’s your turn!

Captain Moore is coming to Australia as part of his Plastic Pollution Conversation tour promoting his new book, ‘Plastic Ocean’. You can meet Charles in Sydney on 26th Sept at Taronga Zoo, 27th Sept at North Bondi RSL, Huskisson Sept. 24th, Melbourne 23rd Sept and Hobart Sept 21st. Entry is by donation or by purchasing a signed copy of the book for $20.

Fill out a simple online form to tell your local politician what you want here.

Last week I walked a 200m stretch of my road and collected 87 recyclable bottles & cans that would not be littered if we had a CDS. Currently Australia allows 8 BILLION beverage containers to be landfilled or littered every year. It’s not good enough!

I filmed this short video with my smart-phone to show how bad the situation is:

I often talk about the desperate need for Australia (and indeed every region in the world) to adopt a National Container Deposit Scheme (CDS) to manage the waste generated by the beverage industry. For 35 years Australians have been scratching their heads and wondering why it is that only one of our eight States and Territories (South Australia) had this scheme that drastically reduces litter, boosts recycling and funds community programs. Well…it’s time to stop scratching your head and start telling your political leaders that the time is NOW!

What would 8 Billion containers look like? This graphic depicts 2 million bottles, the amount used in America every 5 minutes. It’s by the fantastic artist Chris Jordan http://www.chrisjordan.com

In Australia we use over 13 billion beverage containers every year. Did you read that, 13 BILLION containers! People often consume beverages away from home and hence the recycling rate for these containers is very low, only around 40%. That means that around 8 billion of these containers are wasted into landfill or littered into the environment every year. Look around you and find a beverage container, now imagine 8, 000, 000, 000 of those. 8 billion containers that could have been recycled but instead were buried underground or left in the environment where they can easily become marine debris.

Last year I did a series of talks with Denise Hardesty from the CSIRO who is undertaking a three year study examining the threats of marine debris to Australia’s wildlife and she declared from her research and experience that up to one third of all global plastic pollution can be sourced back to the beverage industry. One third of the suspected tens of millions of tonnes of debris in the ocean is there because of the beverages people drink and the poor systems we have in place to capture the waste and ensure it’s recycled. It’s time for Australia to act.

The devastating truth of plastic pollution is that it it kills over a million innocent creatures every year like this juvenile Laysan Albatross. Look at the bottle lids in the stomach cavity. If the industry really cared about saving wildlife they would have designed a system where bottle lids are tethered to the beverage bottles. Then instead of bottle litter being potentially three pieces of litter it would remain only one.

South Australia has had a successful CDS operating since 1975 that sees an 80% collection rate of containers. Talk to any South Australian and they’ll tell you the system works perfectly and results in negligible litter of beverage containers on roadsides and public places. Not only does it result in negligible litter and the highest rates of recycling in Australia it also provides an amazing fundraising platform for community organisations like the Scouts who use CDS as a multi-million dollar funding platform. In January 2012 the Northern Territory introduced a 10 cent cash for containers scheme, the first time an Australian State has succeeded in doing so since SA and believe it or not, the beverage industry giant Coca Cola threatened the Northern Territory Government with legal action for doing so.  With surveys consistently showing that over 85% of Australians support the scheme and in Tasmania rates as high as 91% you are most surely asking the big question, “Why isn’t it all across Australia?”

Well, it’s certainly not because the people don’t want it. Politicians in our democracy are messengers of the people and if over 85% say “Yes” then there are obviously some other powers at play. Let’s go through them.

Think about how much pocket money the kids will make! In SA the Scouts process up to $20m in container returns annually earning them almost $2m in revenue! The people want this! Photo from a recent rally in Canberra supporting CDS.

First and foremost it is the beverage industry that has blocked this legislation. Beverage giants like Coca Cola are firmly opposed to this scheme from a philosophical standpoint. Why? Because a CDS represents something that makes big business quiver in their boots…extended producer responsibility or EPR. EPR means that the maker of a product is made accountable for the product once you have finished with it i.e. they are responsible for the waste generated by it once you’re done. Coca Cola and the dozens of other beverage makers out there would have to fund the 10 cent return of the container once it’s taken back to a collection depot. Ironically, the old scheme where you used to get a refund for glass milk and soda bottles was based on the notion that the beverage makers ‘owned’ the bottles and hence the refund was in place to give people the incentive to return it. Once it became cost effective to manufacture disposable containers no producer EVER wanted to be responsible or ‘own’ the container ever again. As soon as new disposable packages started showing up in the landscape as litter the PR geniuses at the big beverage brands decided they needed to distance themselves even further from the notion that the empty containers were ‘theirs’ so they started industry funded campaigns like Keep America Beautiful and Keep Australia Beautiful and proclaimed that ‘bottles don’t litter the environment…people do.’ Anti-litter campaigns are important tools for stopping some of the problem but since the famous ‘crying Indian’ commercial aired in the USA in 1971 and dozens of ads and campaigns since we are STILL suffering from an epidemic of littering. For a great analysis of anti-litter ads from around the world click here.

In a very interesting twist to the above paragraph, Coca Cola has recently threatened legal action against the Israeli company Sodastream for deformation and for breaching trademark after Sodastream’s ‘Cage Challenge’ marketing stunt got under Coke’s skin. Sodastream has been using installations in public places for some time now where they cage up thousands of empty bottles collected from local landfills to highlight the wastefulness of disposable bottled beverages and the lack of recycling. Sodastream calculates to date that their product has saved over 1.8 billion bottles from going to landfill and they see this as a huge competitive edge in steering conscious consumers away from bottled soda and into a Sodastream system. Anyway, Coca Cola have claimed that by displaying their bottles (although installations contain many brands) in the installation that Sodastream is breaching their trademark. Suddenly the empty bottle dumped in the landfill that Coca Cola wanted to disown is suddenly their ‘property’ again and they want to control how it is portrayed. Talk about wanting to have your cake and eat it too…their appetite is insatiable! Needless to say this is working very favourably for Sodastream with their ‘Cage Challenge’ Facebook page topping over 110K thousand ‘Likes’ and them gaining huge publicity whilst slandering Coca Cola. Sodastream CEO Max Foster delivered a great talk on CNN on the situation.

The Cage Challenge on display in Times Square. Although the installation shows many companies empty bottles, it was Coca Cola who threatened legal action.

Because a CDS goes against big business’ philosophy of making money whilst having zero accountability for waste at the end of a products life they are coming up with absurd claims to stop it in its tracks. Claims about how much money a CDS will cost, that it’s a new ‘tax’, how much of a burden it will be, how inefficient it will be and of course how they would do things better. First lets tackle the cost.  Will your bottle of Coke go up in price by 10 cents? Well, maybe. But think about how often you go into a store and find the price of Coke or bottled water varying drastically. I went into a couple of stores recently and found prices for a can of Coke fluctuating from $3.25 to $2.50 to as low as $2.00 in a vending machine. That’s a variation of $1.25, am I really going to notice the $0.10 difference? If people were deeply concerned about saving money they would go and buy the no-name brand of soda for a quarter of the price and not even drink the overpriced Coke, but they do and they will continue to. And it’s not an extra cost…it’s a refundable deposit that I’ll get back when I return the container. This is also where the industries claims of this being a ‘new tax’ are preposterous. How can this be a new ‘tax’? A tax is where the government receives the money, the government isn’t getting this money, it goes back to the consumer and any excess in the current SA and NT models in fact goes back to the industry.

It’s true that to cover the initial costs of the scheme in NT the prices of beverages went up by over 10 cents as a result of a ‘handling fee’. A handling fee helps cover the costs of collecting bottles and cans from remote communities and will help in the early stages until collection centre networks are properly developed. What the industry doesn’t tell you when they criticise the implementation of the NT scheme is that what happens to the money from the unreclaimed deposits? Beverage container recycling in the NT was disastrously low prior to the scheme and now with the scheme it’s getting better. In the first quarter of 2012 NT saw a 25% return rate for refundable bottles sold meaning only $800, 000 was paid out…what about the other 75%? Where is the remainder of the $2.4 million that belongs to consumers and not the beverage companies? What they won’t tell you is that the beverage industry can actually MAKE money from this scheme.

Of course a new system will cost money, that’s a given. Establishing the collection centres will cost money and take time but it’s something that MUST be done. Collection centres once established will become very efficient and lucrative facilities for recycling of a whole manner of materials including: batteries, scrap metal, cardboard and e-waste. Once this network is complete we should see a massive drop in the amount of waste going to landfill and hence huge savings for local government who can focus on more efficient waste collection services. Some opponents to CDS argue that the scheme will harm kerbside recycling collection, as people will not put valuable recyclables in the kerbside bin. In fact the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW SUPPORT a National CDS and have determined it could cut costs of the kerbside collection scheme by up to $18 million per annum. The scheme will lead to far greater quality in collected recyclables and less contamination. Contamination of recycled material is a major problem at recycling facilities and can often see entire batches of recyclable content wasted in landfill and can damage expensive machinery. This is about making an investment for the future of waste in Australia.

The left side of this image shows a contaminated recycling bin at a local park, plastic bags and all sorts of rubbish that would deem the entire batch waste as it would damage machinery. The right image shows the garbage bin that has plenty of recyclable containers in it. Two bins, side by side and they DO NOT WORK! The solution is to incentivise people to recycle their waste, bins and education just don’t work!

So what does the industry suggest as a better system than CDS? They suggest more bins. That’s it…more bins and more education. This is the same suggestion they have been making for years…it’s the same blame game that ‘people litter’ and that putting more bins out there will make all the difference. In total they suggest putting 30, 000 public place recycling bins over three years. So what does 30, 000 bins look like? Well, with over 22 million people in Australia that’s about one bin for every 700 people, and it’s more bins that have to be collected by local governments at their own cost and it’s 30, 000 more bins open to easy contamination. Take a peek inside a garbage bin today and check if there are recyclables in it, I bet there is. The industry solution will not work; it will just perpetuate the problem. It won’t solve the millions of bottles being littered or land filled when people are in remote areas, or those being thrown into the garbage when no recycling bins are around or solve the amount of containers pubs and business landfill ever day as it’s too expensive to pay for recycling services.

So there you have my rant and now it’s time for you to act. With one simple click you can submit a letter to your local politician telling them that you support a Nationwide CDS. Please do it now. Around Australia State governments are speaking out in favour of CDS but we need you, the people, to tell them they must say, “Yes to CDS”. At a recent rally we held in Sydney Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke said he agreed that a National framework would work but unfortunately it is up to the State leaders to decide, State leaders who are unfortunately at the mercy of the political lobbyists from the beverage industry who are spending HUGE dollars fighting this battle.  We are most concerned about Queensland so if you live in QLD, please act. The QLD Premier does not prioritise waste as an issue and even abolished the new $35/tn waste levy on taking office.

If you’re passionate about this then please join us in talking to your representatives, we need you! The decision process will hinge on what our politicians think and what their constituents say. Write a letter to your paper, ring your local radio station, have your children make an installation at school, write to Coca Cola or any of the 150 other companies funding a current anti CDS campaign and if you can donate to support the efforts of the Boomerang Alliance, a collection of 21 environmental organisations united to bring this legislation change.

Thank you in advance.

Come on Coca Cola, let the people have their say! Stop lobbying politicians and interrupting our democracy!

Notes:

You may have seen the recent Change.org Campaign constructed to petition Coopers Beer to Stop Funding Anti-Recycling Campaigns. Coopers are one of 150 member companies to the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) who are the industry group speaking out in opposition to the CDS scheme. Coopers have previously spoken in support of a CDS, are a family owned company, are the biggest Australian owned brewery and are based in South Australia – all very good reasons to pressure them to pull out of the AFGC and their anti-recycling campaign. Sign the petition and share it here.

For a full list of all 150 member companies (including: Coca Cola, Coopers, Fosters, Schweppes, Ocean Spray, Nestle, Yakult, McDonalds etc) of the AFGC click here.

For documentation to support the claims I have made in this article please click here for briefing notes prepared by the Boomerang Alliance of 21 environmental organisations in Australia.

Like the Cash for Containers campaign on Facebook here.

Checking the surf at Blue Bay today I watched an old timer suck the last puff from his cigarette and flick it onto the grass 10m from the beach. For any of you who know Blue Bay you’ll know that this particular ‘patch’ is a social space where young and old check the surf, share stories and catch up for regular arvo brews. It’s as such a cigarette butt minefield. I asked old timer if he always flicks away his butts to which he replied bluntly, “Yeah”. I said to old timer that “That’s a shame because cigarette butts don’t dissolve in the sea and I find myself always picking up the filthy things and I’m not even a smoker!” He muttered something before collecting his board and entering the sea.

Disappointed more than anything I picked up his butt and a few more and thought about what chance we have to motivate our youth to ‘do the right thing’ when old timers behave like that. Moments later I decided that I had to resolve this small challenge, so despite the mushy 1 footers rolling through the Bay, I suited up and went to finish the conversation. I paddled up to old timer and politely asked him if he would consider changing his ways and putting his butts in the bin (after all there was 2 bins within 5m from where he flicked his butt). Old timer immediately arched up and said, “If you like picking them up so much why don’t you just do it!” I said that I really shouldn’t have to to which he replied, “Mate, if I wanted to be preached to today I would have gone to church!” (being Sunday I thought that was a pretty good reply but had one more in the bag). I replied with a doozie, “Well, this is my temple and I don’t appreciate cigarette butts in it!”

In my composed voice I reiterated how disappointed I was to see surfers not respecting the ocean and that we should be the ones caring and doing everything we can to keep our break clean. You could see his mind ticking away despite him wanting to end this sacrilegious conversation as quickly as possible and he muttered, “You’ve got a point, I’ll think about it.”

“I’ll think about it” is hardly a win but it was enough to make me smile and leave him alone for the rest of the surf. There’s some ‘old dogs’ out there that are going to be hard to teach new tricks but I’m not asking him to do a backflip or beg for a Schmacko, I just want him to put his cigarette butts in the bin and maybe, just maybe ask his mates to do the same. I hope you’ll join me.

This post is dedicated to someone who knows cigarette butts better than anyone… Danielle Richardet runs a page called It Starts With Me (view the great blog here) and with her family has spent every day for the last year and a half cleaning her beach, Wrightsville Beach in North Carolina. During that time she has collected 38, 000 cigarette butts. That’s a lot of old timers doing a lot of flicking. Now she’s taking action with the Surfrider Foundation‘s support and asking her local government to ban smoking on the stretch of beach. If you live in the states please fill in the online letter to the Mayor. If you don’t live in the states, kindly ask anyone you see littering their butts to please stop doing it. And then ask them to do a backflip.

This brings me directly to the brand new campaign film my organisation Take 3 has just released. Today it was me fishing cigarette butts from the sand just like Danielle…what will future generations be fishing from the sea? This film asks the question..

Once upon a time when you bought a soda or a bottle of milk you were obligated to return that bottle once you were done, the bottle BELONGED to the manufacturer. To maximise the returns there was a refundable deposit placed on the item so you WANTED to give them back. Years later corporations evolved to realise life would be so much easier for you if items were disposable. Why worry about the logistics and cost of reclaiming glass bottles to be cleaned and reused when they can simply be thrown away? Enter the aluminium can and plastic PET bottle.

Fast forward to 2011 and we’re using over 12 billion beverage containers every year in Australia to satisfy our desires for a convenient cold drink. The demand for the PET plastic used to satisfy for our appetite for bottled water alone in Australia in 2009/10 meant 52.5 million litres of oil were used. Add to that the fact that we are only recycling approximately 36% of these PET bottles in Australia and you have a pretty serious problem on your hands – millions of discarded bottles ending up in landfill or worse still littered across the landscape – and in our oceans.

I am a huge supporter of the introduction of a Nationwide adoption of a refund on beverage containers as has worked successfully in South Australia since 1976. By simply placing a 10 cent incentive on PET bottles South Australia has been able to achieve a 74% recycling rate, over double the National rate! Whilst the Commonwealth Government takes an eternity to act on this seemingly simple law, surveys have shown up to 82% of Australians agree with its introduction – where’s the democracy in that? As of January 3^rd 2012 the Northern Territory has adopted the cash for containers scheme despite the threats of Coca Cola Ammatil who threatened to take the NT Government to court to prevent its introduction.

Paul Sharp from the Two Hands Project is another big believer in placing an incentive on the return of common litter items. So much so that he believes in placing a refund not only on beverage containers but also on the most littered item globally…the cigarette butt! The team at Two Hands with the help of the Total Environment Centre and Bendigo Bank have managed a radical campaign recently where they are offering a 10 cent refund on bottles, cans AND cigarette butts paid out of their own pocket. Last Sunday I visited their stall at Manly Beach where I was amazed at the enthusiasm of people so eager to pick up other people’s trash to make a little bit of pocket money. I witnessed kids with pockets bulging full of 10-cent coins – amazed at how easy it was to make money on a busy day at the beach. When I spoke to the kids and told them that in South Australia you could make money like this EVERYDAY they almost fainted – a twinkle formed in their eye and they went running to Mum and Dad asking what they could do to make it happen every day. Even parents’ ears pricked up when they realised they wouldn’t have to worry about paying out pocket money anymore.

Photo: twohandsproject.org

For me it’s simple – we NEED legislation to counter the littering of the most prevalent pieces of trash out there including plastic bags, beverage containers and cigarette butts. The industry groups for the corporations insist that that legislation won’t work and that it’s as simple as putting more bins and recycling facilities in public places. They preach that you as a consumer will recycle because it makes you “feel good” so all we need is more recycling bins and it will be problem solved. This spin is designed to continue to make you feel like you are the one responsible for that item once you’re done – not accounting for the fact that it should be THEIR responsibility to dispose of the plastic, not the local council. Placing a refund on beverage containers works all around the world and it’s time we told them to smarten up and support REAL recycling. If people are happy to spend their time picking up used cigarette butts for a 10 cent refund then you can bet an introduction of a 10 cent refund on bottles and cans will lead to a massive reduction in litter Australia wide.

So, what can you do to help the introduction of the Cash For Containers scheme in Australia? Please visit the site for the Boomerang Alliance – an alliance of 18 environmental organisations and groups pushing for the legislation change and quickly write a message to the Environment Minister showing your support.

Check out this great campaign developed by GetUp! showing the lengths Coca Cola Ammatil are going to to prevent the introduction of the legislation.

Interested in this issue? Listen to this one hour Background Briefing report on ABC Radio National from September 2011 titled ‘Money For Empties’

Want to hold a refund event in your area or have any ideas of other stunts we can do to bring awareness to this issue? Any ideas on how to get funding for these events? Contact Tim for more information.

Here is the edited version of my talk

What are your thoughts on plastic bags? Do you think you could live without the ultra-thin plastic bags you get from the supermarket? Personally, I’m a huge fan of the need for a ban on plastic bags among other forms of highly pervasive forms of plastic (beverage bottles, styrofoam) that constitute a large portion of the plastic waste that is entering our waterways and the ocean and negatively impacting innocent wildlife. You might think that you ‘do the right thing’ with your plastic bags and use them as a bin liner or drop them in the recycling bin at the supermarket but the truth is, we are only recycling about 5-10% of the plastic bags we use in Australia. How many do we use in Australia annually?…between 4 and 6 billion!

Please sign the petition here.

You might wonder why we are guessing the exact figure, somewhere between 4 and 6 billion seems like a pretty broad estimate, well that’s because the big supermarket retailers don’t want to tell us exactly how many they’re using. A whistleblower leaked information recently showing the big stores might be accountable for a billion ‘phantom’ bags.

A lot of people ask me what they are going to use as bin liners or to pick up their dogs poo if we get a bag ban. Well, think about it…we didn’t have plastic bags until the 1970′s…what did we do before then? We used alternatives like newspaper or we just washed our bins afterwards. Also, a plastic bag ban is not going to eliminate ALL plastic bags…you’ll still get plastic bags with products like bread and you will still have lots of other plastic bags in your life. A bag ban focusses on the immediate threat which is the ultra-thin checkout plastic bag, the ones that barely even make it home intact without a tear in the side!

Industry groups have tried to stomp their mighty feet and say that banning thin checkout bags only leads to massive increases in the sale of garbage bags and bin liners. My response… “Who cares!” At least if we use these bags to stuff our junk then at least we know they will be weighted down in a landfill and never floating around in the sea. We need to ban thin checkout bags because we use far too many, it’s simply impossible for us to prevent them escaping our clutches and blowing into the ocean when we use 4-6 billion per year.

Please sign the petition here.

The new online petition has been constructed to encourage a ban on single use disposable plastic bags in NSW. This comes as three Australian States and Territories implement thin plastic bag bans. The Northern Territory implemented their ban on 1st September and the ACT commencing their ban on 1st November 2011. South Australia has had a ban in effect since 2009, coupled with their Container Deposit Legislation (CDL) that allows a refundable deposit on beverage containers, they are leading the charge on eliminating persistent and pervasive plastics from entering our environment. Why are our other states lagging?

It seems peculiar to me that we can’t adopt Nationwide policy covering this pervasive form of litter. The writing is on the wall that plastic bags have a very limited future across the globe, even China, Bangladesh and parts of India have banned the hideous and wasteful ultra-thin plastic bag! It is time that we asked our legislators to get this bag ban back on the agenda, after all, our Government under Mr Rudd and Mr Garret assured us of a National rollout in 2008. What happened? The government failed to deliver, leaving South Australia to go it alone and Garret with egg on his face.

Please sign the petition here.

Don’t just wait for our legislators to act, take the pledge today that you will stop using disposable single use plastic items in your life wherever possible.

You can also contact me if you would like to help or download the petition pdf here and gather signatures for us! We want over 10K signatures by the end of Summer!

And if you don’t…well..look out.. the Bag Monster is coming to a beach near you!